<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ret Paladin FCFS Rotations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/</link>
	<description>A WoW Retribution Paladin guide with ret pally gear, leveling, pvp, raiding and stats.  Retribution Paladins for World of Warcraft.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 17:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixin</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-21036</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-21036</guid>
		<description>Hi. I wanted to first of all thank the people making these guides. I am not new to the game but, definitely new to paladins. I wanted to ask the creators of these guides to give an abbreviation deciphering key...Is it somewhere on the site and I missed it? I am so confused with the Paladin spells since they all have very similar names that it would be grand if there was some way to know what each was in the rotation. Just a key at the introduction part of this article. Yes some are obvious...but not all have played paladin before... thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I wanted to first of all thank the people making these guides. I am not new to the game but, definitely new to paladins. I wanted to ask the creators of these guides to give an abbreviation deciphering key&#8230;Is it somewhere on the site and I missed it? I am so confused with the Paladin spells since they all have very similar names that it would be grand if there was some way to know what each was in the rotation. Just a key at the introduction part of this article. Yes some are obvious&#8230;but not all have played paladin before&#8230; thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ds</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-19796</link>
		<dc:creator>ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-19796</guid>
		<description>Just a note.. I&#039;m with vath shu .. want to know why inq is listed as first and not avail now .. and y use it with only 1 hp going in?  if stated earlier that 1hp is a waste?  shouldn&#039;t inq be w 3hp?  having trouble with this rot also</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note.. I&#8217;m with vath shu .. want to know why inq is listed as first and not avail now .. and y use it with only 1 hp going in?  if stated earlier that 1hp is a waste?  shouldn&#8217;t inq be w 3hp?  having trouble with this rot also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VathShu</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-18189</link>
		<dc:creator>VathShu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-18189</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to get the rotation down and am finding that Inq is never available for a starting hit.  Has this changed since your rotation listing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to get the rotation down and am finding that Inq is never available for a starting hit.  Has this changed since your rotation listing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Towlmarksyour spot</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-16076</link>
		<dc:creator>Towlmarksyour spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-16076</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, your Buddy towl here. Keep it short and sweet  guys. i Just want to thank retributionpaladins dot com for what there doing, god knows half of the pallys in wow that are ret are fail sauce.... So i want to thank youll for helping these Pallys fix there Dps. God knows half of youll need it. tired of running a  heroic and see pallys with 3 and 4k dps when should be alot alot alot higher. Sorry guys no offense why this site is here.... just want to thank the creators of the site, and thank the pallys who admit they are haveing problems and are looking to better there playing.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, your Buddy towl here. Keep it short and sweet  guys. i Just want to thank retributionpaladins dot com for what there doing, god knows half of the pallys in wow that are ret are fail sauce&#8230;. So i want to thank youll for helping these Pallys fix there Dps. God knows half of youll need it. tired of running a  heroic and see pallys with 3 and 4k dps when should be alot alot alot higher. Sorry guys no offense why this site is here&#8230;. just want to thank the creators of the site, and thank the pallys who admit they are haveing problems and are looking to better there playing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isilador</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-14436</link>
		<dc:creator>Isilador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-14436</guid>
		<description>@Ffont and Ninda- The latter HW in the priority system is Holy Wrath, and im assuming the first is Hammer of Wrath
(typo I&#039;m guessing).

@Cilkia - It is considered a net DPS loss to use your CD&#039;s seperately, yes your damage is less &quot;spiky&quot; but it is still an overall damage loss. 

To clear up some confusion I have had in the past (as well as some guild members), CS should be used every 3rd CD ideally (almost never happens due to procs and CD clashes), unless it will not generate holy power (3 holy power with a divine purpose proc). 

In Layman&#039;s terms, dump your holy pwer so you can generate more before using a CS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ffont and Ninda- The latter HW in the priority system is Holy Wrath, and im assuming the first is Hammer of Wrath<br />
(typo I&#8217;m guessing).</p>
<p>@Cilkia &#8211; It is considered a net DPS loss to use your CD&#8217;s seperately, yes your damage is less &#8220;spiky&#8221; but it is still an overall damage loss. </p>
<p>To clear up some confusion I have had in the past (as well as some guild members), CS should be used every 3rd CD ideally (almost never happens due to procs and CD clashes), unless it will not generate holy power (3 holy power with a divine purpose proc). </p>
<p>In Layman&#8217;s terms, dump your holy pwer so you can generate more before using a CS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cilkia</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-14043</link>
		<dc:creator>Cilkia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-14043</guid>
		<description>hmm i don&#039;t use AV and zealotry together, i rather wait until my fury of angerforge is ready and then use 1 of them (most of the time zealotry) together with the trinket. the other one i use to fill the place between the start and the 5 stacks of raw fury necesairy to use the trinket, together with guardian. That way i&#039;ll always have an &quot;extra attack&quot; (TV with zeal and HoW with AV) and a strenght increase(trinket and guardian) it just gives me the feeling im doing the same damage ad keep it, instead of bursting really high for 20 seconds, and then dropping again. In PvP however, i tend to use it sometimes.

@infy
never use less then 3 HP, always a waste (except if you need a REALLY fast heal with WoG, which is DPS loss anyway)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm i don&#8217;t use AV and zealotry together, i rather wait until my fury of angerforge is ready and then use 1 of them (most of the time zealotry) together with the trinket. the other one i use to fill the place between the start and the 5 stacks of raw fury necesairy to use the trinket, together with guardian. That way i&#8217;ll always have an &#8220;extra attack&#8221; (TV with zeal and HoW with AV) and a strenght increase(trinket and guardian) it just gives me the feeling im doing the same damage ad keep it, instead of bursting really high for 20 seconds, and then dropping again. In PvP however, i tend to use it sometimes.</p>
<p>@infy<br />
never use less then 3 HP, always a waste (except if you need a REALLY fast heal with WoG, which is DPS loss anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infy</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-13079</link>
		<dc:creator>Infy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-13079</guid>
		<description>forgive my ignorance, but the initial Inq should be 3 stacks of HP correct? As well as TV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgive my ignorance, but the initial Inq should be 3 stacks of HP correct? As well as TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninda</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-12771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-12771</guid>
		<description>With Glyph of Exorcism:
Inq &gt; CS&gt; TV&gt; Exo&gt; HW &gt; Judge &gt; HW &gt; Cons 

Is this wrong?
I know Hammer of Wrath is verry hign the rotation list and can be used when popped Avenging Wrath.

Inquisition --&gt; Crusader strike --&gt; Templars Verdict --&gt; **Hammer of wrath or Holy Wrath?**</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Glyph of Exorcism:<br />
Inq &gt; CS&gt; TV&gt; Exo&gt; HW &gt; Judge &gt; HW &gt; Cons </p>
<p>Is this wrong?<br />
I know Hammer of Wrath is verry hign the rotation list and can be used when popped Avenging Wrath.</p>
<p>Inquisition &#8211;&gt; Crusader strike &#8211;&gt; Templars Verdict &#8211;&gt; **Hammer of wrath or Holy Wrath?**</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyssix</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-12655</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyssix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-12655</guid>
		<description>So, I assume that when your instant exorcism comes up, you&#039;ll use that right away and then re-start your rotation, correct??  Or just pick up where you left off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I assume that when your instant exorcism comes up, you&#8217;ll use that right away and then re-start your rotation, correct??  Or just pick up where you left off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lightpaly</title>
		<link>http://retributionpaladins.com/fcfs-rotations/comment-page-2/#comment-12600</link>
		<dc:creator>Lightpaly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retributionpaladins.com/?p=6#comment-12600</guid>
		<description>This might sound noobish, but what does the Ex stand for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might sound noobish, but what does the Ex stand for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

